Am I a bad bisexual?

[Apleasureseeker]

Here's my thing: I think I've always been highly sexual, and like many people, I had bisexual curiousity, and a little expereince as a kid. Puperty hit an I was quite girl crazy!:tongue: After about the age of thirty, I inexplicablr found my body sometimes responding to men as well as women (in porn, at the gym, etc). Decided I needed to explore it a bit after a bit of soul searching (I'd coaxed women into opening up to bisexuality, so the arguements in favor of same-sex sex were already in my head).
Thing is, most bisexuals I've met are more fully bisexual--able to connect emotionally, kiss and fuck and be fucked. After a little exploration, I seem to be permanently bi-curious. I enjoy massage, sucking and being sucked, and becasue I'm naturally a little dominant, comfortable taking control, or applying a little bondage or punishment if it helps. No kissing, no cuddling, etc.
I'd like to connect with a few more men, but only do well with younger, bi-curious guys who only want the experience of sucking and orgasming with another man. I know how difficult it can be for guys at this stage, since the homo-energy leaves the body with an orgasm, and you feel like you want ot run.
I think I'd be quite a sexual let-down for a fully bisexual man.
What do you guys think?

[Ushanki]

Couldn't agree more - love-making isn't sex-making - I like all women totally, I like all men partially, and only love one woman. So, like, not love, to see and feel balls and dicks cumming and probably tongue a nip but no higher than that. Early on I was kissed by a guy during a mutual blow job and while I didn't get indignant by any means, I didn't really like it - though we both enjoyed the end results. He wanted love-making so I never got to make-sex with his dick again. And it turned me off to men for years until I learned that there really are some of us guys that just enjoy sharing our dicks with each other sometimes.

[Realist]

Although, I haven't had much experience, I've been both lover and sex-buddy. Each person is different and if you're not flexible, you may run the risk of missing out of something special.

For me, however, I feel best when I'm in a romantic relationship with either gender.

Only you know what you want and need, I'd just stick to that, if I were you.

[torpedoman]

I love women and always love to look at them and make love to them BUT I also love to have sex with guys. Not into kissing them except on their manhood. Touching, licking, sucking and kissing a cock and balls is so exciting nothing compares. I also must say after I cum the desire quickly fades, until I am horny again.

[Mmonty]

Everyone is different. I'm with the guys that don't find emotional romantic feelings part of the sex with guys. I've been with a couple of guys who wanted to connect more that way....but I'm not comfortable with it. ....usually. There was one encounter where the guy was just effeminate enough that I felt like "making love". It was interesting, and enjoyable, but I still tend to prefer encounters that are enjoyable, but strictly for pleasure....more than "hi there let's get off" but less than " I love you dearly" or some such thing.

[Withatwist]

Hello Apleasure,
I have to agree with you. My fantasy is a guy who's built ... just like me ..., and enjoy him only from the waist down. I'm not into the 'upper head' stuff.
That may make my fantasy tough to realize though.

[thatcher29]

Interesting thread. For the last ten years or so, sex with men was always something I did for simple enjoyment. I certainly wasn't looking for a relationship. And for the most part, my partners were similar and we never went past a few meetings. Now that I'm older, there seems to have been a shift in my thinking and I'm beginning to want a bit more friendship and snuggling along with the sex. Although I haven't met anyone I would consider a lover yet, I do enjoy the conversation and the times of two guys sharing stories of their lives and adventures. So in the future, who knows?

[Cherokee_Mountaincat]

Ok, I'm glad this thread came up. I was told recently that I am a bad Bisexual. I adore kissing, touching, licking nipples and suckling, causing all kinds of pleasures, but I an Very picky about who I do oral on. I was told I'm not a true bi-sexual because I'm not really much for "Munching" at the Y. Until I showed him how adapt I am with the male anatomy...he didnt any complaints or comments after that..lol;)
But I know many people who dont kiss, now do they enjoy oral..so does this make me an untrue bisexual because I prefer giving head to men over 'all' women? I Do love going down on a woman, but she has to be someone I know, and like Very well...
So am I a bad Bi person? :(
Cat

[mikey3000]

Hmmm. That's where I'm different. I don't want just the dick. I want the man attached to it too. The male bonding, the affection and masculine tenderness. I won't have it any other way. Random, anonymous hook ups just aren't for me.

[elian]

Is funny, when I was growing up and "gay -or- straight" was all I knew I always question whether I was gay or not based on the fact that I'm more romantically then sexually attracted to guys - although I have been sexually aroused by both genders.

It's a lot easier just to not apply labels.


Here's my thing: I think I've always been highly sexual, and like many people, I had bisexual curiousity, and a little expereince as a kid. Puperty hit an I was quite girl crazy!:tongue: After about the age of thirty, I inexplicablr found my body sometimes responding to men as well as women (in porn, at the gym, etc). Decided I needed to explore it a bit after a bit of soul searching (I'd coaxed women into opening up to bisexuality, so the arguements in favor of same-sex sex were already in my head).
Thing is, most bisexuals I've met are more fully bisexual--able to connect emotionally, kiss and fuck and be fucked. After a little exploration, I seem to be permanently bi-curious. I enjoy massage, sucking and being sucked, and becasue I'm naturally a little dominant, comfortable taking control, or applying a little bondage or punishment if it helps. No kissing, no cuddling, etc.
I'd like to connect with a few more men, but only do well with younger, bi-curious guys who only want the experience of sucking and orgasming with another man. I know how difficult it can be for guys at this stage, since the homo-energy leaves the body with an orgasm, and you feel like you want ot run.
I think I'd be quite a sexual let-down for a fully bisexual man.
What do you guys think?

[citystyleguy]

are you a bad bisexual? Nope, you are not a bi-sexual, but as you list yourself 'a pleasure seeker', you are a hetero, pleasure seeking male, with a desire for a little tartare sauce on the side!

the only guy-type you express an interest in, are the type that bear many aspects of the expected female traits, i.e. another female-type that you actually seem to perfer.

from my experience, what i have a difficult time with, is this 'some of the time i am this, but at another time i am that'; what i have never been able to undertand is that somehow the bisexual is a 'borrowing' from one sexual type, and a 'borrowing' from the other, like making some damn receipe!

i am bisexual all of the time! my best description of this, i am at my local coffeehouse, sitting in booth or in my favorite chair, drinking my espresso, shades on, scoping the scene; in walks a guy, thirties, levis, a thin, form hugging t-shirt, tight defined body, while coming in the other door, is fine looking women, toned body of a dancer, carefully/perfectly groomed, wearing those loose back type of shoes, making that clip-clap as they hit the tile floor, wearing a short lightly flouncing skirt, that allows just enough time toe see the thong under them, from my vantage point, all the while my favorite barista, a round figured latina, thick dark hair tied back in a pony tail is working the coffee machine, while the somewhat older man, late 50's defined muscles under the soft sport coat and trousers, off-white shirt, closed clipped salt & pepper hair, dark blond. hell, i'm having fantasy(ies) galore with one and all, in what ever permutations that pop into my head. ...and my sex life differs only, in that i am a classic serial monogamous male, with one girl, and one guy at a time, though one of both at the same time is my preference!

that is what being bisexual is all about!

[Cherokee_Mountaincat]

What the hell does a persons size have to do with Anything? Thats not the issue here but whatever form you're in at the time, you have to play the fat/obese card. Find a new rant, that one is stale.:disgust:

Its a person's Personal preference if they dont do oral or not, or if they dont kiss same sex partners, or love oral and not do anal. Its a matter or Their preferences. If a person doesnt feel compelled to become emotionally involved with a same sex partner, that's ok too..and I didnt see where ts mandatory in the Bisexual handbook. :rolleyes:
And for the record if you'll look back on it, I didnt say I Didnt do oral on women, I just said I was very Particular. And No, not All bisexual females go diving down on just any and every pussy they encounter. If they do, again, that's Their personal preference. :tong:
Cat

[darkeyes]

Women who are truely bisexual really do love to eat pussy and are not picky about who the other woman is.

Granted people do have their own personal tastes but the bisexual women I am friends with and who I have had relationships with are not that picky when it comes to what woman they give or get oral sex from. The bisexual women I know and have encountered have told me how they are not into fat and obese butch women and most bi women prefer very feminine thin, curvy --this means women who are curvy and not the ones who are fat and obese that say that they are curvy, or average sized women who clearly do not have a weight problem.

By truely bisexual women, I mean women who actually are bisexual and who love sex with women and who fall in love with women and they are not just straight women having sex with women just to please their boyfriend or husband so he can watch two women at once or who have sex away from their boyfriend or husband and tell him all about it since he wants them to go out and have sex with a woman when they are straight and are not even sexually attracted to other women.

Stop talkin through ya arse hun... ther is the small matta a bein attracted 2 a person fore ya gets near 2 doin owt wiv 'em..most of us prefer 2 fancy those we hav ne kinda sex wiv... str8/bi/gay/trans don matta... but we do ya kno.. ther r times an reasons wen thats not the case.. but usually.. wen left 2 ouir own devices..

[Apleasureseeker]

Thanks to everyone who responded. It was nice to get naked in front of you all, so to speak, both the approving and the dissaproving. For me there are degrees of bisexuality. I thought that as I got more comfortable with my bisexuality that i'd gradually become more bi, but it hasn't happened. A girl I know calls my sexuality hetero-flexible, which I kind of like.

It's also nice to know there are other men out there who's sexuality matches my own--only bisexual when the sex drive is high. It's almost like a Jekyll and Hyde thing: the testosterone levels rise and open up a whole new range of acceptable behavior, but only acceptable as long as the trestosterone is pumping. (I've had enough experience now that I am still bisexual after I've finished with another guy and not feeling like I did something wrong). I'm totally understanding of curious guys who feel the same way and am careful to keep them on the excruciating edge of orgasm for as long as possible, which lets them enjoy the bi-sexperience for a long time before letting them cum, and I'm fully comfortable that they have the feeling of having to run afterwards.

Hetero-flexible, I guess.

[tenni]

I would encourage you to think about bisexuality as not good or bad, not by degrees but by variety. There is a wide range of how people express their bisexuality. If you enjoy being with both men and women then accept that once you try being sexually with both a couple of times that your curiousity has been quenched. Maybe, it takes you many, many times over a decade or more to decide that you are bisexual. Maybe, you don't explore inside yourself this question until later in life. If you enjoy only physical interactions with same sex but emotional and physical with the opposite sex that doesn't make you less of a bisexual or bad.

I wonder if you are dealing with some form of guilt over this? Deep down do you feel that you are less bisexual because you do not have emotional attachment to other men? Does that make it feel better and what you do enjoy as more acceptable to you? I know that you are writing the opposite...as if you are not worthy of being called "bisexual" because you do not experience emotional attachment...but just maybe it is the reverse?

Don't worry about the label though. If it feels right to think of yourself as "heteroflexible" fine...go for it.


Thanks to everyone who responded. It was nice to get naked in front of you all, so to speak, both the approving and the dissaproving. For me there are degrees of bisexuality. I thought that as I got more comfortable with my bisexuality that i'd gradually become more bi, but it hasn't happened. A girl I know calls my sexuality hetero-flexible, which I kind of like.

It's also nice to know there are other men out there who's sexuality matches my own--only bisexual when the sex drive is high. It's almost like a Jekyll and Hyde thing: the testosterone levels rise and open up a whole new range of acceptable behavior, but only acceptable as long as the trestosterone is pumping. (I've had enough experience now that I am still bisexual after I've finished with another guy and not feeling like I did something wrong). I'm totally understanding of curious guys who feel the same way and am careful to keep them on the excruciating edge of orgasm for as long as possible, which lets them enjoy the bi-sexperience for a long time before letting them cum, and I'm fully comfortable that they have the feeling of having to run afterwards.

Hetero-flexible, I guess.

[dramafreetx]

I guess I'm not a good bisexual either, as my interest in men is simply for physical pleasure and friendship. I guess I'm not a good heterosexual either, because i have an interest in men for physical pleasure. Oh, whatever will I do? I don't fit into a category! I don't have a clear and defined label hung around my neck! Woe is me.

Oh, wait, yes I do...what is it again? Oh, yeah, "Human".

The only real reason that i put down that I am bi on sites like this is because it is the only choice that I am given that conveys the fact that I like to have naughty fun with both sexes.

So, who cares what you call it, as long as you honest with your partner(s), doing what makes you happy, and not hurting anyone along the way.

[elian]

I thought the "Oh My God, I Did What?!" feeling only came from being too drunk to think straight but I think what you describe would explain a lot of the behavior I see in "hook-ups". Mainly that society doesn't think it's right and it's been drilled into our heads to be ashamed of who we are attracted to..

Not saying that everyone should be a slut, but I think that it would go a long way if people weren't ashamed or afraid to show love and affection for each other. In other words maybe the urge to go and do a "hook-up" wouldn't be so bad if people were loved and respected for who they were instead of what they have.


Thanks to everyone who responded. It was nice to get naked in front of you all, so to speak, both the approving and the dissaproving. For me there are degrees of bisexuality. I thought that as I got more comfortable with my bisexuality that i'd gradually become more bi, but it hasn't happened. A girl I know calls my sexuality hetero-flexible, which I kind of like.

It's also nice to know there are other men out there who's sexuality matches my own--only bisexual when the sex drive is high. It's almost like a Jekyll and Hyde thing: the testosterone levels rise and open up a whole new range of acceptable behavior, but only acceptable as long as the trestosterone is pumping. (I've had enough experience now that I am still bisexual after I've finished with another guy and not feeling like I did something wrong). I'm totally understanding of curious guys who feel the same way and am careful to keep them on the excruciating edge of orgasm for as long as possible, which lets them enjoy the bi-sexperience for a long time before letting them cum, and I'm fully comfortable that they have the feeling of having to run afterwards.

Hetero-flexible, I guess.

[ronnalex]

Here's my thing: I think I've always been highly sexual, and like many people, I had bisexual curiousity, and a little expereince as a kid. Puperty hit an I was quite girl crazy!:tongue: After about the age of thirty, I inexplicablr found my body sometimes responding to men as well as women (in porn, at the gym, etc). Decided I needed to explore it a bit after a bit of soul searching (I'd coaxed women into opening up to bisexuality, so the arguements in favor of same-sex sex were already in my head).
Thing is, most bisexuals I've met are more fully bisexual--able to connect emotionally, kiss and fuck and be fucked. After a little exploration, I seem to be permanently bi-curious. I enjoy massage, sucking and being sucked, and becasue I'm naturally a little dominant, comfortable taking control, or applying a little bondage or punishment if it helps. No kissing, no cuddling, etc.
I'd like to connect with a few more men, but only do well with younger, bi-curious guys who only want the experience of sucking and orgasming with another man. I know how difficult it can be for guys at this stage, since the homo-energy leaves the body with an orgasm, and you feel like you want ot run.
I think I'd be quite a sexual let-down for a fully bisexual man.
What do you guys think?y you need 2 get buttfucked

[Cherokee_Mountaincat]

I guess I'm not a good bisexual either, as my interest in men is simply for physical pleasure and friendship. I guess I'm not a good heterosexual either, because i have an interest in men for physical pleasure. Oh, whatever will I do? I don't fit into a category! I don't have a clear and defined label hung around my neck! Woe is me.

Oh, wait, yes I do...what is it again? Oh, yeah, "Human".

The only real reason that i put down that I am bi on sites like this is because it is the only choice that I am given that conveys the fact that I like to have naughty fun with both sexes.

So, who cares what you call it, as long as you honest with your partner(s), doing what makes you happy, and not hurting anyone along the way.

Big boobie hugs and kisses all over the face goes to Dramafree. Kudos on an excellent post, Sweetie.
Cat

[thatcher29]

Not saying that everyone should be a slut, but I think that it would go a long way if people weren't ashamed or afraid to show love and affection for each other. In other words maybe the urge to go and do a "hook-up" wouldn't be so bad if people were loved and respected for who they were instead of what they have.

Hey, sluts need love too. If being bisexual teaches us anything, it is that sexual preferences are awfully wide and there's very little limits on what turns people on. If someone's preferred sexual expression is "hook-ups", then who am I to tell them they can't? Yes, the majority of people say they prefer "relationships" but I've found there's a time in many people's lives when they just want to go out and enjoy no-strings sex with another individual for the pure pleasure of it. For most gay and bisexual guys, their first same-sex is often something quick and stealthy. I think it's great that people can go out and explore their sexuality in this way. Different strokes...

[Apleasureseeker]

I wonder if you are dealing with some form of guilt over this? Deep down do you feel that you are less bisexual because you do not have emotional attachment to other men? Does that make it feel better and what you do enjoy as more acceptable to you? I know that you are writing the opposite...as if you are not worthy of being called "bisexual" because you do not experience emotional attachment...but just maybe it is the reverse?

Don't worry about the label though. If it feels right to think of yourself as "heteroflexible" fine...go for it.

Guilt? No, no guilt. I'm not a big beleiver in lables. Sexual labels in particular can be self-constructed traps. I don't like tomatos, and have no particular guilt over that, either. But just as it can be tricky to order a sandwich and get it without tomatos, it can be tricky to find a man who enjoys a similar level of heteroflexibility :cool:
It's really the same sexual compatibility issue that everyone goes through, but made more complicated. I'm at my best with guys like me, mostly straight, but really appreciative of the beauty and eroticism of the sexual response of a man's body. but without the emotional connection. To a degree it's based on a release of surpus testosterone, but specifically through male on male pleasure. The deeper emotional bonding and opening, for me, only happens with women.

Thanks for the interesting insight, though.

[NEPHX]

This is rather long and the intent is the general idea. Please don't pick apart specific comments.... Its a post not a book although, its kinda long :eek:



Thing is, most bisexuals I've met are more fully bisexual--able to connect emotionally, kiss and fuck and be fucked.

I think you're mixing sexual orientation with "sexual acts" to identify bisexual people... yourself or otherwise. See KSOG references below. There are many books and papers on the topic by people with lots of cool letters behind their name that talk about these things in detail.... but briefly as a layman (ok, not so briefly, I got wordy again)....

I would suggest that your statistical sample is extremely small in comparison to the number of people that may consider themselves bisexual or others may consider their lifestyle one that would fit the definition (easy please, don't attack that statement before ready the rest as most would say "we are what we say we are"

For instant, just because my current primary LTR is a male does NOT make me now "gay" (although some have insisted I am).... I am bisexual, I identify as such but my sexuality is also fluid to some extent but hovers right in the middle on most variables most of the time in the KSOG - Past, Present and Ideal - again, see below).

There are so many more people, present and past, that identify (invisibly perhaps as we don't all wear t-shirts) as bisexual or who may be bisexual in their own mind without the label or identify as such at some point down the road or in the past that are very similar to you.

The acceptable definition by most academics/authors/etc is that nothing we do makes us anything..... we are who and what we say we are/identify as.

I'd say there would be far fewer people that fit your definition of "fully" bisexual (I guess that would be consider a 3 on Kinsey Scale, 4 across the board on KSOG (see below). And, no score on the KSOG tallies up to say your "bisexual". There is no "answer" as its the journey/exercise that enlightens us to the complexity of human sexuality.

Since sexuality is considered fluid, how would anyone "peg" a "good bisexual" (opposite of your words of a "bad bisexual"). You seem to mix bisexual orientation/identity with sexual "acts" of intimacy or interaction. Maybe start with trying to identify what "bisexual" means to you (your allowed to do that I'm told :-) after reading what some others say it means to them. It has less to do with "what" one does more so as to what one has the capacity to desire.

Check out "Getting Bi" (1st or 2nd Edition) or any of the Bisexual Resource Guides from Editor/Author Robyn Ochs' own continually refining definition of bisexuality. Robyn's definition in the 1st edition says:

"I call myself bisexual because I acknowledge in myself the potential to be attracted, romantically and/or sexually, to people of more than one sex, not necessarily at the same time, not necessarily in the same way, and not necessarily to the same degree."

She also acknowledges that this definition will change yet again, as she continues to learn. In reading her books and materials over time, its been interesting watching her definition evolve. The thing that stands out to me is that she uses "I speak" strictly referring to how she views herself and her definition.


I think I'd be quite a sexual let-down for a fully bisexual man.

I would doubt that .... if you reference Robyn's definition above. If you are with someone interested in the same "things" as you, and they identify as bisexual in the middle of the KSOG variables, etc, you'd be just fine as apparently, you have already discovered.

As for me, without the first kiss, I'm generally not interested :tong:

I would also recommend you read the Dr. Fritz Klein book:The Bisexual Option. In it, he goes into detail on his seven variables that go into human sexuality and discusses the Klein Sexual Orientation Grid (KSOG). Seven variables, three time periods: Past (more than a year) present (within a year) and Ideal. One can also fill out the "KSOG" at somewhat regular intervals and actually chart where each variable goes (www.binetaz.org/sexuality_grid.htm) with relation to your own personal history.

Past and Present are pretty straight forward. In a presentation a number of years ago, I've present conference sessions (with Dr. Klein) on my ideas about the "Ideal" period and how we have inhibitors both personal, societal, family history, religious, expectations of masculinity, to name just a few, that could prevent us from reaching our "Ideal" which is why its not called the future as we don't know the future only what we'd hope for... ideally. I think we all "evolve" as we become more comfortable and accepting of ourselves and how we view our sexuality and grow, it changes us. You might notice that the KSOG does not say BISEXUAL anywhere in it. We can break down some or all of these inhibitors to our Ideal and sometimes, even build others as society/life changes.

It would seem, speaking from personal experience, that some/many or even most (given enough time) of us can grow to include more of the commonly accepted romantic/sexual/intimate customs usually seen or expected in opposite-sex relationships. The media has been helping with that one in the past 15+ years with more same-sex relationships in movies and TV (some good, some bad, some mixed). Acceptance in society and role models is important.

I think people are like snow flakes, if everyone is different (and many may be very close/similar) but our paths in life are all different. The variables that make up sexuality are fluid within themselves, change over some time period, etc. So basically, the complexity can seem overwhelming. People change, grow, etc. with their interaction with the world.

As in many things such as Quantum Physics, the very act of measuring a thing can immediately change it. By attempting to measure/quantify your sexuality, I think we are likely to change from the very journey and perhaps more fully understand yourself and refine your identity. That time period of change may be an hour, a day, a month, a year, a decade, a lifetime (if ever for some). Even writing about it... can make us think and ponder.

I have seen both polar extremes.... those that can completely enjoy sex with a same-sex partner but never be romantic or really intimate/fall in love for whatever reason.. be it inhibitors of some form or... its just not their thing. I think the other pole is equally plausible and common that people can be romantic with an other sex but not sexual (lets not even get into how many "sexes" there are as gender identity is equally complex and important to many). And, of course, there so many variations in between... the gray areas, the fluidity. Some people are asexual but very romantic and even affectionate. I dated one person that was so very romantic, intimate, affectionate but, when it came to actual sexual interaction..... it sooooo didn't work at all between us.

I would suggest that you not limit your thoughts that intimacy/romance involves kissing there are likely many people that don't enjoy it. Likewise, sexual intimacy between two men (or between a man and a women for that matter), as an example, does not necessarily involve anal intercourse/PIV intercourse.

A very good set of two books to check out is "The Best Little Boy In The World" written by Andrew Tobias as by John Reid as well as the follow-on "The Best Little Boy In the World Grows Up" by Andrew Tobias (no longer known as John Reid). Its a fascinating story where he discusses his own personal coming out and includes his sexual likes and dislikes and their effects him and such as well as a glimpse of growing up in a world that grew more accepting as time goes by (discarded his pen name for the second book - a big deal to a famous financial guru who has socialized with US presidents).

The real point in all this is that you are not a "bad bisexual" for what you "don't do" or "do" enjoy. You are YOU; 1st and foremost. Unique, perhaps even fluid/evolving further (or comfy where you are).... in 10, 20, 30 years your story may be very different.

As my example, I never expected to be where I am today in my relationships.... talk about being completely blindsided :eek:

[Jade Pecker]

You are what you is and that' s all it tis.......I love having hot sex with men and women, but afterwards want to be buddies...you know, shoot the bull, have a beer, etc. Most women I meet want to move in, and most guys want to run for the hills. Oh well, as Coleridge's Ancient Mariner once said "I yam what I yam and that's all what I yam!" The Wedding Guest DID say that when the Ancient Mariner ate spinach he heard "yankee doodle" in the background and the guns on the tattoo of the SS New York on the old rips chest started firing.......
But my kitten does not care. She is trying to read this, but I doubt she will succeed, even if she IS smart...for a cat. At 5:00 am my neighbor gets up,,,,I get to hear him taking a shit, then trying to sing in the shower...this morning it was Joe Walsh...PPPPPEEEYYOOOOOO!!!
-Roger

[foreverbi]

I am now & always have been with a woman. I have been married 3 times, but I have ALWAYS considered a bisexual. Don't get me wrong as I loved 2 of my ( 1 was just for convenience). The reason I am not with a man is because I live in a rural area & and being married to a woman is expected. I would rather suck a cock than a pussy as I am hooked on the taste & texture of male cum. Is there anyone else with this (problem)?:male:

[darkeyes]

Nope.. don accept there is such a thing as a bad bisexual.. just bad people who happen to b bisexuals... u think u r a bad person PleasureSeeker? Doesnt sound it to me really.. these forums are full of posts showin that bisexuality goes in degrees.. there r many different kinds.. in fact I would say just as every str8 is unique in her or his str8ness, every gay in her or his gayness, as is every bisexual in their sexuality..:)

[Apleasureseeker]

Nope.. don accept there is such a thing as a bad bisexual.. just bad people who happen to b bisexuals... u think u r a bad person PleasureSeeker? Doesnt sound it to me really.. these forums are full of posts showin that bisexuality goes in degrees.. there r many different kinds.. in fact I would say just as every str8 is unique in her or his str8ness, every gay in her or his gayness, as is every bisexual in their sexuality..:)

Hi Darkeyes! Not a bad person at all! I'm great, in my own modest, fantastic way. Just thinking I'm more Heteroflexible, than bi. I really enjoy what I enjoy. I heard someone say they like to play a woman's body like an instrument, push it to get the most beautiful, extreme music out of it. I like that, it kind of describes my approach, and if a woman is a guitar, I'm definitely a guitarist! With a guy, I'm a guitarist who's enjoying dabbling on the bagpipes--I still want to make intense music, but there's not the emotional expression. t's not my instrument, so to speak.

I'd really like to enjoy more m2m fun, but it's so much more complicated than hetero! I don't want to dissapoint anyone or lead them on. Most of the bi guys I've met who are splashing in the shallows like me really want to be out in the deep water, but that just doesn't satisfy me.

You know DE, I love the way your comments bring out a lot of content with very few words! Oh, and thanks for writing in english for a change :tongue: